Lima, Peru. Adelantecronopio@hotmail.com
http://cronopiocortazar.blogspot.com
"Video meliora proboque, sequor deteriorates." This Latin phrase seems to have been the watchword of the organizers of the recent XII National Congress of Students of Education (CONEED), held in the city of Ica, between the seventeenth and August 21 this year. Agramante field that unfolded in the said conference is not only a corollary of the actions of a clique incurious, but the result of a total ineffectiveness of the institutions responsible for the oversight and control of it. Recall that the fiasco of this year was begotten in the city of Iquitos, where the demagogic practice of "verba volant" Some students gave him a look almost surreal to the proposal from the University San Luis Gonzaga de Ica as a new congressional seat. Needless to talk about the unique environments used to develop the event and the absence of some speakers at the main days. I think all this is an assertion lirondo mondo and known by each student congress. The problem is deeper than all these truths of yore. It's about a total and absolute rule of improvisation factor. It is clear that those directly responsible for the puppet show are members of the organization.
Now, in regard to the lectures was quite an interesting symbolic of a Roman circus. The conference is defective in the specific weight of a swollen, sometimes ideological pride, Amen of the hoarse voices of paroxysm supporter. This does not mean that politics must move away from educational issues. Quite the contrary, the link between the two areas of scientific work should be shortened, to the extent necessary to develop a synergy between its teleological construction, the ethics of their projects and the extent of his speeches related to national reality. But what we saw in Ica was the competition for hegemony in favor of a small group of people fly for years say the interests of the student body. It is important to note that despite ideological differences prevailed the open and democratic praxis exercise of heuristics. Obviously, the debate often ceased to be important to go to become a deplorable scene of accusations and slander. Thus, the rapporteur José Lora Cam broke seventeen fires on Monday at the opening of the congress. Within hours of the morning began to develop his presentation entitled philosophical and epistemological foundations of education. With an acre and indeed virulent language, sometimes even Mountaineer, Professor Lora Cam began to slide a number of ideas related to the ontology of educational practice. From a Marxist perspective Lora stressed the need for a profound change in the economic and social structures of our country in order to weave solutions to educational problems. These ideas are not new and that the spirit of José Carlos Mariategui lavished them originally encompassed more than half a century. Perhaps the most redeeming, perhaps unique, is their teacher Lora flaming and furious defense of Marxism, at least in times of global political hypocrisy. Interestingly his handling of the categories at the level of philosophical language and in the meadows of the political, as the correlation of the dynamics of the educational phenomenon. Professor Lora is also a local guide in the art of controversy. The conference allowed him to deploy a whole host of adjectives bienhadados depicting the harshness of the discourse from resistance. Taking as demiurges areas of otherness Lora approaches hold an incomparable force, to the point of highlighting the brittle foundations of thought. The thesis of Marxism can be critical, no doubt. But what gives uniqueness to the disquisitions of Lora are the depth and transparency of their arguments. Many of them can be labeled as Jacobins and chimerical. But they are ideas that open a range of possibilities to give Erklären, serious and novel explanation to the national reality. It is true that Professor Lora often overflow into epithets disqualifying important part of the political class urbi et orbi. However, diatribes are not free. Following Nietzsche's thought ruled that the foul word and letter grossest are more educated than the silence.
On the other hand, the eighteenth day made its appearance Ollanta Humala who deployed an arsenal of knowledge on the history and politics of our country. His presentation was entitled Alternatives to social and educational poverty. Humala's words reminded us that we were close to an election. Therefore, from the other side, the paper called educational policies and national education project, Lourdes Flores Nano put the hog on August 19. The galleries were puzzling to observe a respectable right-wing leader turned into a complacent Estela Martinez de Peron. It looked like the reincarnation of an intellectual of social democracy. Frankfurt himself would have envied circle of the ropes discursive Dr. Flores. The theoretical lines acquired in the process and the dynamics of Catholic conservatism, as well as its commitment to the extreme neoliberalism conspicuous by their absence. It is clear that the political calculus has a bigger weight in transforming the academic scene at a gallery party proposals, always aiming to co-opt and channel the will of some voters.
Finally, we note that other papers left much to be desired. It is a sad reminder that took place on the last day of the congress. In his statement, the speaker of name Dervy Jimenez was given a new synonym to sememe sophist. For a moment we believed to be in the atrium of a church run by Johann Tetzel. They even invaded the question of whether we were at a conference of students or in the amphitheater of a wealthy yuppie being demolished by the lewd circumlocutions and discursive outbursts of a jay of Coehlo and Cornejo. There is no doubt that the overall balance of the congress held in Ica, much to my regret, is negative. However, it is necessary to rescue some student presentations that generated the deep and relevant debate of ideas about education issues. Likewise, there are many reasons to congratulate the people of Ica, perhaps most important is related to good treatment and respect for the tourist. Hopefully the organizers of the next Congress, the same to be held in the city of Chiclayo, please join seriously evaluate the importance of their work, since it depends on the consolidation of a discursive project from the areas of academic language and praxis policy. Aldo
0 comments:
Post a Comment